Progress for New Mexico, 2007
New Mexico’s legislature in March overwhelming passed the nation’s strongest law protecting landowners faced with oil and gas drilling.

Download a brochure describing the new law. [pdf]

Led by Oil and Gas Accountability Project, the New Mexico Cattle Growers Association and the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, the campaign for landowners rights took center stage this year in the Roundhouse - New Mexico’s State Capitol in Santa Fe. Sponsored by Representative Andy Nunez, the bill received the endorsement of organizations including San Juan Citizens Alliance, Sierra Club and the New Mexico Oil & Gas Association.

Because of the strong coalition, the support of Governor Richardson and landowners and legislators across the state, we negotiated from a position of strength with the oil and gas industry to develop House Bill 827. While 827 is not the same bill we started with in the 2005 session we held to our bottom lines and came out with a bill now considered to be the nation’s strongest legislation protecting landowners facing oil and gas development.

For example, no other state requires: 1) The breadth of information that must be supplied to landowners when a company gives notice of oil and gas operations (the laundry list of items to be included in surface use and compensation agreements is unmatched); 2) the breadth of compensation for damages and use (loss of agricultural production and income, lost land value, lost use of and lost access to the surface owner’s land and lost value of improvements caused by oil and gas operations); 3) and, the duty to reclaim.

Currently, companies in New Mexico are NOT required to have a written agreement with a rancher or homeowner before they drill an oil or gas well NOR are they required to pay for the use of the land surface. The companies decide where to drill and where to put the roads, tanks and pits; then they decide when to drill. This legislation helps landowners protect their surface rights and the value of their property. This surface use agreement and compensation bill begins to restore the balance by ensuring that the oil and gas company gives written notice to the landowner and provides a written agreement (or posts a bond) before operations can begin.

HOW THE SURFACE OWNERS PROTECTION ACT WORKS
The Surface Owners Protection Act requires the oil and gas operator to:

  • Notify the surface owner 30 days prior to beginning any oil and gas operations;
  • Describe the proposed operations so that the surface owner can evaluate the effects of the operations on his/her property;
  • Propose a surface use and compensation agreement that addresses the timing, location and scope of operations and an offer of compensation; the bill provides the elements that should be included in the offer of compensation. The bill gives the surface owner 20 days to accept, negotiate changes to, or reject the agreement and offer. If no agreement is reached within 30 days, the bill allows the operator to post a surety bond of $10,000 for the benefit of the surface owner, or a $25,000 statewide blanket bond and then begin operations. The surface owner may then file a legal claim for the use of the land and any damages.

Regarding bonding-on (when there is no agreement between the landowner and oil company), the bill requires a company to post either a $10,000 damages bond or a $25,000 statewide “blanket” bond for all its wells. If the damages from one well exceeds the $25,000 amount in the blanket bond, the company must re-up its bond. Currently, a company can come on a person’s property without posting any bond amount at all. Companies are currently only required to post a reclamation bond with the state for final plugging and abandonment.

If a New Mexican goes to court today to get damages from an oil company, under common law, the burden of proof is on the landowner to demonstrate that a company caused unreasonable damages. With SOPA, it will be much easier to get compensation for damages because you will not have to prove whether or not a company was reasonable in its operations on your land. Companies will be required to pay compensation for damages and use under SOPA.

Currently, landowners in New Mexico are afforded no protection when companies want to conduct oil and gas operations on their property. Landowners are at the mercy of the companies. We acknowledge that there are landowners with existing oil and gas that have developed reasonable agreements with operators. Unfortunately, those with large landholdings and the financial resources to hire good attorneys are the ones doing the best in today’s climate – and even some of those are still having a tough time. This bill will level the playing field for all landowners - and those smaller property owners - who tend to end up with the short end of the stick.


Progress for Colorado, 2007

Governor signs major revamp of industry-dominated state oil and gas commission, April 2007! After a decade of effort, lawmakers stripped industry of its control over oil and gas regulations, and added representatives of public health, wildlife, and agriculture to the commission.

 

Colorado’s new Landowner Protection Act, 2007, requires, for the first time:

  • that oil and gas companies consider the rights of landowners
  • that oil and gas companies minimize their impact to the surface
  • that unreasonable use of the surface gives a landowner a cause of action (to bring a lawsuit)
  • in any litigation, puts the burden of proof on companies - not landowners - to demonstrate their reasonable use of the surface.
  • This bill does not establish, alter, impair or negate the current authority of local and county government to regulate land use related to oil and gas operations

This new law sets out requirements that companies minimize impacts and damage and these requirements will lead to the use of best practices. Employment of best practices has shown to reduce impacts AND increase profits and production through more efficient exploration and production techniques.

To address this conflict, the Landowner Protection Act codifies the 1997 decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in Gerrity v. Magness, which laid out a framework for accommodation between the competing uses.

Under the Gerrity decision, mineral owners may access the oil or gas beneath the surface in a way that accommodates the surface owner’s use of their property “to the fullest extent possible.” The court’s decision provides a standard – minimizing adverse impacts to the surface – that surface owners currently do not have when negotiating with operators under COGCC rules or the Colorado Oil and Gas Act.

The Landowner Protection Act does not mandate specific well locations, production techniques or COGCC involvement in private negotiations. Instead, the law simply requires oil and gas operators to choose those means of operation that will minimize the intrusion and damage to the surface.

  • As highlighted by the court in Gerrity, operators are in a much better position to know which means of operation are technologically sound and economically practicable. Therefore, the Landowner Protection Act requires that operators bear the burden to choose locations and techniques that will give reasonable access to the oil or gas, while minimizing impact and damage to the surface owners’ use of the surface of the land.
Untitled Document
     
Contact
I want to help; please keep me informed with regular updates, click here.